How NDA’s Rafale Deal is Statistically Better Than UPA-1’s And UPA-2’s

⏩Why Rafale Deal didn’t go to Hindustan Aeronautics Limited ?
⏩Price of Bare Bones RAFALE UPA-1 – Rs 765.4 Crore, NDA – Rs 696 Crore
⏩Price of Flyway Fully Weaponised RAFALE – UPA 2 – Rs 1705 Crore, NDA -Rs 1646 Crore.
⏩Price of HAL’s Fully Weaponised RAFALE – Rs 4603.5 Crore.
⏩Know All 14 India-Specific Modifications

🔴Rafale Deal : Signed on September 23, 2016

Total Amount (Approximate)-Euro 7.8 billion
Cost of Platform – Euro 3.4 billion

Infra Support and Supplies – Euro 1.8 billion

India Specific Changes – Euro 1.7 billion

Additional Weapons Package – Euro 710 million
Performance Based Logistics Support – Euro 353 million

🔴Comparison Of UPA-1 and NDA’s Negotiated Price Of Bare Bones Rafale :

The figure of Rs.525 crore or approximately €79 million per Rafale, which the Indian National Congress has been citing, is based on Dassault Aviation’s 2007 RFP response at the then exchange rate (Euro I = Rs.66) and that too for only the 18 Rafales that were to be delivered off-the-shelf by Dassault Aviation. The 2007 price for each of the 18 Rafales would have amounted in 2015 to €100.85 million (Rs.765.4 crore at 2015 exchange rate of Euro 1 = Rs 75.90). Similarly, the 2007 bid price for every Eurofighter EF-2000 would in 2015 have worked out to be €102.85 million, higher than that of the Rafale. In comparison, the average price of each of the 36 “bare/green” Rafales bought in 2016 is €91.7 million (Rs.696 crore at the 2015 exchange rate), lower than both the earlier 2007 Rafale and Eurofighter EF-2000 RFP responses. The exact price for the 28 single-seat Rafales is €91.07 million (Rs.681 crore) each; and that of each of the eight tandem-seat Rafales is €94 million (Rs.703 crore).

🔴Why HAL Was Kept Out ?

Coming to unit-prices of the 108 Rafales that were to be licence-assembled by the Bengaluru-based and MoD-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, or HAL (the workshare agreement between HAL and Dassault Aviation was signed on March 13, 2014), Dassault Aviation had estimated that each HAL-built Rafale will cost 2.7 times more (including Rs. 68 crore in labour costs alone per aircraft) than a Rafale delivered by Dassault Aviation. This is because not only would HAL have had to upgrade its in-house airframe fabrication and systems integration capabilities entirely through imported hardware and expertise, but the same also would have had to be undertaken by several of the private-sector and public-sector industrial entities that had been identified by HAL and Dassault Aviation as vendors. These would have included the following:

Airframe Component Providers: fuel tanks and pylons (5 vendors), tooling hardware (12 vendors), mechanical parts and sub-assemblies (21 vendors)

Turbofan Component Providers: mechanical parts, tubes and pipes (5 vendors)

Avionics Components Providers: AESA-MMR sub-assemblies,, cockpit displays (3 vendors), electronic boards (4 vendors), automated test-benches (5 vendors)

Accessories Providers: cabinets (3 vendors), screws and rivets (1 vendor), tubes (1 vendor), wiring harnesses (5 vendors)

Simulator Services Provider: 1 vendor

Ground Support Equipment Supplier: 6 vendors

Engineering, Software & Services: 13 vendors

Data Conversion Service Provider: 2 vendors

MRO Services Provider: 4 vendors

🔴Customer-Furnished Hardware Specified For Integration With Rafale M-MRCA :

All the IAF Rafales will feature 14 customer-specific modifications, comprising:
1) integration of the RAFAEL-supplied LITENING target acquisition/designation pod;
2) integration of the RAFAEL-supplied Spice-1000 standoff PGM and its related data-link pod;
3) integration of MBDA-supplied Meteor BVRAAM and ALARM anti-radiation missile;
4) integration of the RAFAEL-supplied X-Guard towed-decoy and development of its on-board location cabinets;
5) upgradation of the SPECTRA EW suite to accommodate low-band, medium-band and high-band directional jammer apertures;
6) integration of the TARGO-2 HMDS supplied by Elbit Systems (also ordered by Qatar);
7) installation of a THALES-supplied traffic collision avoidance system (TCAS);
8 ) installation of a THALES-supplied standby radar altimeter;
9) Optimisation of the M88 turbofan’s jet-fuel starter for operating in sub-zero temperatures at altitudes above 9,000 feet ASL;
10) increase in the capacity of the on-board OBOGS;
11) addition of weather-mapping mode of operation in the THALES-supplied RBE-2 AESA-MMR;
12) development of quad-pack ejectors for the DRDO-engineered and Spice-250 PGM-derived SAAW EMP-generating standoff PGM;
13) assistance in flight-qualification of DRDO-developed 450kg laser-guided HSLD bomb and integration of the bomb’s FOG-based inertial navigation system with the Rafale’s on-board Sigma-95N RLG-INS through a MIL-STD-1553B interface;
14) modification of the Sigma-95N RLG-INS’ coupled GPS transceiver in order to receive MIL-STD PY-code coordinates from India’s NAVIC/IRNSS constellation of GPS satellites.

🔴BOTTOMLINE – Comparison Of UPA-2, HAL and NDA’s Fully Weaponised RAFALE :

Nett cost of each of the 18 fully weaponised Rafale M-MRCA in flyaway condition as negotiated by the UPA-2 government was Rs.1,705 crore and that of each meant-to-be-licence-built Rafale was Rs.4,603.5 crore, whereas the figure for each of the 36 flyaway Rafales now on order works out to Rs.1,646 crore.

Contrary to the Indian National Congress’ allegations about the Dassault Reliance Aerospace joint-venture industrial entity being the sole beneficiary/executor of the 50% indirect industrial offsets package that forms part of the €7.87 billion (Rs.59,000 crore) Rafale M-MRCA contract, Dassault Reliance Aerospace will only be one of several key industrial players in the execution of offset obligations. This is because under any government-to-government contractual agreement, industrial offset obligations are always fulfilled by respective industrial consortiums, i.e. from the French side the consortium comprises OEMs like Dassault Aviation, THALES and the SAFRAN Group. And THALES and the SAFRAN Group are still in the process of finalising their industrial offsets obligations. Consequently, each of these three French OEMs is entitled to fulfil only one-third portion of the mandated 50% industrial offsets content.

( Source of Figures : )

Facebook Comments

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker